<!-- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm vs Luzz Imperial Dragon 14mm: which one to choose? -->
# JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm vs Luzz Imperial Dragon 14mm

Scores calculated from the specs ([how we calculate](https://racquetrank.com/ca/methodology/)). Reference prices from stores, checked every day.

## Racquets in the comparison

2 racquets Pickleball

- [Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm JOOLA](https://racquetrank.com/ca/pickleball/joola/perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm/)

- [Imperial Dragon 14mm Luzz](https://racquetrank.com/ca/pickleball/luzz/imperial-dragon-14mm-2024/)

Search racquets

Highlight differencesHide identical
Best in row Different Same

| 2 racquetsLowest price | Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm JOOLA RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good | Imperial Dragon 14mm Luzz RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good No offers right now | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

| 2 racquetsHighest RR Score: Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm JOOLA (81). | #1JOOLAPerseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm JOOLA RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good See price at JOOLA | #2LuzzImperial Dragon 14mm Luzz RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good No offers right now | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Where to buy | | | |
| All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | JOOLASee price | No offers right now | |
| RR Score | | | |
| RR Score | RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good | RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good | |
| Dimensions | | | |
| Weight | 8 oz | 8.1 oz | |
| Width | 7.5 in | 7.1 in | |
| Length | 16.5 in | 16.2 in | |
| Grip length | 5.5 in | 5.5 in | |
| Grip circumference | 4.3 in | 4.1 in | |
| Shape | Elongated | No data | |
| Construction | | | |
| Face material | Textured carbon | T700 Friction carbon | |
| Core | Honeycomb polymer | No data | |
| Core thickness | 16 mm | 14 mm | |
| Edge protection | Yes | No data | |
| Thermoformed | Yes | Yes | |
| USA Pickleball approved | Yes | Yes | |
| Offers summary | | | |
| Lowest price | No data | No data | |

## Other pickleball comparisons

- [Engage Pursuit Alpha Pro 16mm vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/engage-pursuit-alpha-pro-16mm-2025-vs-joola-perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm/)

- [Holbrook Mav 16mm vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/holbrook-mav-16mm-2026-vs-joola-perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm/)

- [Hudef Viva Pro Elongated Gen 3 vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/hudef-viva-pro-elongated-gen-3-vs-joola-perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm/)

- [CRBN 3X Power Series 16mm vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/crbn-3x-power-series-16mm-vs-joola-perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm/)

- [JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm vs Vatic Pro Prism LH 14mm V7](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/joola-perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm-vs-vatic-pro-prism-lh-14mm-v7/)

- [JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm vs Luzz Pro Cannon](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/joola-perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm-vs-luzz-pro-cannon-2025/)

- [Luzz Imperial Dragon 14mm vs Luzz Original](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/luzz-imperial-dragon-14mm-2024-vs-luzz-original-paddle-2025/)

- [Luzz Imperial Dragon 14mm vs Luzz Pro 2nd Archer](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/luzz-imperial-dragon-14mm-2024-vs-luzz-pro-2nd-archer-2025/)

- [Luzz Imperial Dragon 14mm vs Luzz Pro ZZ 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/luzz-imperial-dragon-14mm-2024-vs-luzz-pro-zz-16mm-2024/)

- [Engage Pursuit Alpha Pro 16mm vs Luzz Imperial Dragon 14mm](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/engage-pursuit-alpha-pro-16mm-2025-vs-luzz-imperial-dragon-14mm-2024/)

- [Holbrook Mav 16mm vs Luzz Imperial Dragon 14mm](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/holbrook-mav-16mm-2026-vs-luzz-imperial-dragon-14mm-2024/)

---
Source: https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/joola-perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm-vs-luzz-imperial-dragon-14mm-2024/
