# Ronbus Pulsar FX.R1 vs Vatic Pro Prism V7 16mm Scores calculated from the specs ([how we calculate](https://racquetrank.com/ca/methodology/)). Reference prices from stores, checked every day. ## Racquets in the comparison 2 racquets Pickleball - [Pulsar FX.R1 Ronbus](https://racquetrank.com/ca/pickleball/ronbus/pulsar-fx-r1-2024/) - [Prism V7 16mm Vatic Pro](https://racquetrank.com/ca/pickleball/vatic-pro/prism-v7-16mm/) Search racquets Highlight differencesHide identical Best in row Different Same | 2 racquetsLowest price | Pulsar FX.R1 Ronbus RR Score 82 out of 100, Very good | Prism V7 16mm Vatic Pro RR Score 90 out of 100, Excellent | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2 racquetsHighest RR Score: Prism V7 16mm Vatic Pro (90). | #1RonbusPulsar FX.R1 Ronbus RR Score 82 out of 100, Very good See price at AmazonOffers | #2Vatic ProPrism V7 16mm Vatic Pro RR Score 90 out of 100, Excellent See price at TenniszonOffers | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Where to buy | | | | | All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | AmazonSee pricePickleball PaddlesSee priceSee offer details | TenniszonSee priceSee offer details | | | RR Score | | | | | RR Score | RR Score 82 out of 100, Very good | RR Score 90 out of 100, Excellent | | | Dimensions | | | | | Weight | 8.2 oz | 8.4 ozmeasured by Pickleball Effect | | | Width | No data | 7.5 in | | | Length | No data | 16.5 in | | | Grip length | 5.5 in | 5.3 in | | | Grip circumference | 4.1 in | 4.1 in | | | Shape | Elongated | Elongated | | | Construction | | | | | Face material | Raw Toray T700 carbon | T700 carbon | | | Core | Polypropylene honeycomb | C7 polymer and honeycomb | | | Core thickness | 16 mm | 16 mm | | | Edge protection | No data | Yes | | | Thermoformed | Yes | No data | | | USA Pickleball approved | No data | Yes | | | Offers summary | | | | | Lowest price | No data | No data | | ## Other pickleball comparisons - [JOOLA Ben Johns Hyperion CFS 16 vs Ronbus Pulsar FX.R1](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/joola-ben-johns-hyperion-cfs-16-cfs-16-vs-ronbus-pulsar-fx-r1-2024/) - [Vatic Pro Prism Flash 16mm vs Vatic Pro Prism V7 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/vatic-pro-prism-flash-16mm-vs-vatic-pro-prism-v7-16mm/) - [HEAD Radical Nite vs Vatic Pro Prism V7 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/head-radical-nite-vs-vatic-pro-prism-v7-16mm/) - [Vatic Pro Prism Flash 14mm vs Vatic Pro Prism V7 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/vatic-pro-prism-flash-14mm-vs-vatic-pro-prism-v7-16mm/) - [JOOLA Ben Johns Hyperion CFS 16 vs Vatic Pro Prism V7 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/joola-ben-johns-hyperion-cfs-16-cfs-16-vs-vatic-pro-prism-v7-16mm/) - [Vatic Pro Prism V7 16mm vs Vatic Pro V-Sol Power V7 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/vatic-pro-prism-v7-16mm-vs-vatic-pro-v-sol-power-v7-16mm-2025/) - [Ronbus Pulsar FX.R1 vs Ronbus Pulsar FX.R2](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/ronbus-pulsar-fx-r1-2024-vs-ronbus-pulsar-fx-r2-2024/) - [Ronbus Pulsar FX.R1 vs Ronbus Pulsar FX.R3](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/ronbus-pulsar-fx-r1-2024-vs-ronbus-pulsar-fx-r3-2024/) - [Ronbus Pulsar FX.R1 vs Ronbus R1 Nova](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/ronbus-pulsar-fx-r1-2024-vs-ronbus-r1-nova/) - [Six Zero Double Black Diamond Control Elongated 15mm vs Vatic Pro Prism V7 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/six-zero-double-black-diamond-control-elongated-15mm-2024-vs-vatic-pro-prism-v7-16mm/) - [JOOLA Perseus Pro IV 16mm vs JOOLA Perseus Pro V Ben Johns 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/joola-perseus-pro-iv-16mm-pro-iv-vs-joola-perseus-pro-v-ben-johns-16mm/) --- Fonte: https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/pickleball/ronbus-pulsar-fx-r1-2024-vs-vatic-pro-prism-v7-16mm/