<!-- Wilson Hammer Ultra Light 110 vs Xamsa PXT V2: which one to choose? -->
# Wilson Hammer Ultra Light 110 vs Xamsa PXT V2

- Weight unstrung: 110 g on Wilson Hammer Ultra Light 110 and 115 g on Xamsa PXT V2.

- Head size: 76 in² on Wilson Hammer Ultra Light 110 and 74.9 in² on Xamsa PXT V2.

Scores calculated from the specs ([how we calculate](https://racquetrank.com/ca/methodology/)). Reference prices from stores, checked every day.

## Racquets in the comparison

2 racquets Squash

- [Hammer Ultra Light 110 Wilson](https://racquetrank.com/ca/squash/wilson/hammer-ultra-light-110/)

- [PXT V2 Xamsa](https://racquetrank.com/ca/squash/xamsa/pxt-v2/)

Search racquets

Highlight differencesHide identical
Best in row Different Same

| 2 racquetsLowest price | Hammer Ultra Light 110 Wilson RR Score 63 out of 100, RR Score No offers right now | PXT V2 Xamsa RR Score 62 out of 100, RR Score No offers right now | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

| 2 racquetsHighest RR Score: Hammer Ultra Light 110 Wilson (63). | #1WilsonHammer Ultra Light 110 Wilson RR Score 63 out of 100, RR Score No offers right now | #2XamsaPXT V2 Xamsa RR Score 62 out of 100, RR Score No offers right now | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Where to buy | | | |
| All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | No offers right now | No offers right now | |
| RR Score | | | |
| RR Score | RR Score 63 out of 100, RR Score | RR Score 62 out of 100, RR Score | |
| Dimensions | | | |
| Weight unstrung | 110 g | 115 g | |
| Head size | 76 in² | 74.9 in² | |
| Balance point | More head weight | More head weight | |
| Length | 26.9 in | No data | |
| Construction | | | |
| String pattern | 12x18 | No data | |
| Material | Graphite and Hyper Carbon | Toray Japan carbon fiber | |
| Offers summary | | | |
| Lowest price | No data | No data | |

## Other squash comparisons

- [HEAD G.110 vs Wilson Hammer Ultra Light 110](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/squash/head-g-110-2023-vs-wilson-hammer-ultra-light-110/)

- [Wilson Hammer 110 vs Wilson Hammer Ultra Light 110](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/squash/wilson-hammer-110-vs-wilson-hammer-ultra-light-110/)

- [Wilson Hammer 110 vs Xamsa PXT V2](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/squash/wilson-hammer-110-vs-xamsa-pxt-v2/)

- [Wilson Hammer Lite vs Wilson Hammer Ultra Light 110](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/squash/wilson-hammer-lite-vs-wilson-hammer-ultra-light-110/)

- [Wilson Hammer Lite 120 vs Wilson Hammer Ultra Light 110](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/squash/wilson-hammer-lite-120-vs-wilson-hammer-ultra-light-110/)

- [Wilson Hammer Team vs Wilson Hammer Ultra Light 110](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/squash/wilson-hammer-team-vs-wilson-hammer-ultra-light-110/)

- [Karakal Carbo Tech 110 vs Xamsa PXT V2](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/squash/karakal-carbo-tech-110-2025-vs-xamsa-pxt-v2/)

- [Karakal Carbo Tech 115 vs Xamsa PXT V2](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/squash/karakal-carbo-tech-115-2025-vs-xamsa-pxt-v2/)

- [Karakal Carbo Tech 120 vs Xamsa PXT V2](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/squash/karakal-carbo-tech-120-2025-vs-xamsa-pxt-v2/)

- [Tecnifibre Carboflex 125 NS X-Top V2 vs Tecnifibre Carboflex 125 X-Top V2](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/squash/tecnifibre-carboflex-125-ns-x-top-v2-vs-tecnifibre-carboflex-125-x-top-v2/)

- [Tecnifibre Carboflex 125 X-Top V2 vs Tecnifibre Carboflex NEO 125](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/squash/tecnifibre-carboflex-125-x-top-v2-vs-tecnifibre-carboflex-neo-125/)

---
Source: https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/squash/wilson-hammer-ultra-light-110-vs-xamsa-pxt-v2/
