<!-- Dunlop CX 200 LS 2024 vs Tecnifibre TF40 290 16x19 V3: which one to choose? -->
# Dunlop CX 200 LS 2024 vs Tecnifibre TF40 290 16x19 V3

Scores calculated from the specs ([how we calculate](https://racquetrank.com/ca/methodology/)). Reference prices from stores, checked every day.

## Racquets in the comparison

2 racquets Tennis

- [CX 200 LS 2024 Dunlop](https://racquetrank.com/ca/tennis/dunlop/cx-200-ls-2024/)

- [TF40 290 16x19 V3 Tecnifibre](https://racquetrank.com/ca/tennis/tecnifibre/tf40-290-16x19-v3/)

Search racquets

Highlight differencesHide identical
Best in row Different Same

| 2 racquetsLowest price | CX 200 LS 2024 Dunlop RR Score 62 out of 100, RR Score | TF40 290 16x19 V3 Tecnifibre RR Score 64 out of 100, RR Score | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

| 2 racquetsHighest RR Score: TF40 290 16x19 V3 Tecnifibre (64). | #1DunlopCX 200 LS 2024 Dunlop RR Score 62 out of 100, RR Score See price at Amazon | #2TecnifibreTF40 290 16x19 V3 Tecnifibre RR Score 64 out of 100, RR Score See price at Amazon | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Where to buy | | | |
| All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | AmazonSee price | AmazonSee price | |
| RR Score | | | |
| RR Score | RR Score 62 out of 100, RR Score | RR Score 64 out of 100, RR Score | |
| Dimensions | | | |
| Weight unstrung | 290 g | 290 g | |
| Weight strung | No data | 303 g | |
| Head size | 98 in² | 98 in² | |
| Length | 27 in | 27 in | |
| Balance point | 325 mmunstrung, 6 pts HL | 332 mmstrung, 3 pts HL | |
| Swingweight | No data | 312 | |
| Construction | | | |
| Stiffness (RA) | 65 RA | 65 RA | |
| String pattern | 16x19 | 16x19 | |
| Frame thickness | 21.5/21.5/21.5 mm | 22/22/22 mm | |
| Material | Graphite and Sonic Core Infinergy | Graphite and Dynacore XTC | |
| Offers summary | | | |
| Lowest price | No data | No data | |

## Other tennis comparisons

- [Tecnifibre TF40 290 16x19 V3 vs Tecnifibre TF40 305 16x19 V2](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/tecnifibre-tf40-290-16x19-v3-vs-tecnifibre-tf40-305-16x19-v2/)

- [Tecnifibre TF40 290 16x19 V3 vs Tecnifibre TF40 305 18x20 V3](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/tecnifibre-tf40-290-16x19-v3-vs-tecnifibre-tf40-305-18x20-v3/)

- [Tecnifibre TF40 290 16x19 V3 vs Tecnifibre TF40 315 16x19 V3](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/tecnifibre-tf40-290-16x19-v3-vs-tecnifibre-tf40-315-16x19-v3/)

- [Tecnifibre TF40 290 16x19 V3 vs Tecnifibre TF40 315 18x20 V3](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/tecnifibre-tf40-290-16x19-v3-vs-tecnifibre-tf40-315-18x20-v3/)

- [Tecnifibre TF40 290 16x19 V3 vs Tecnifibre TF40 305 2019](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/tecnifibre-tf40-290-16x19-v3-vs-tecnifibre-tf40-305-2019/)

- [Tecnifibre TF40 290 16x19 V3 vs Tecnifibre TF40 305 16x19 V1](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/tecnifibre-tf40-290-16x19-v3-vs-tecnifibre-tf40-305-16x19-v1/)

- [Tecnifibre TF40 290 16x19 V3 vs Tecnifibre TF40 305 16x19 V3](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/tecnifibre-tf40-290-16x19-v3-vs-tecnifibre-tf40-305-16x19-v3/)

- [Tecnifibre TF40 290 16x19 V3 vs Tecnifibre TF40 305 18x20 V1](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/tecnifibre-tf40-290-16x19-v3-vs-tecnifibre-tf40-305-18x20-v1/)

- [Tecnifibre TF40 290 16x19 V3 vs Tecnifibre TF40 305 18x20 V2](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/tecnifibre-tf40-290-16x19-v3-vs-tecnifibre-tf40-305-18x20-v2/)

- [Tecnifibre TF40 290 16x19 V3 vs Tecnifibre TF40 315 2019](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/tecnifibre-tf40-290-16x19-v3-vs-tecnifibre-tf40-315-2019/)

- [Tecnifibre TF40 290 16x19 V3 vs Tecnifibre TF40 315 16x19 V2](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/tecnifibre-tf40-290-16x19-v3-vs-tecnifibre-tf40-315-16x19-v2/)

- [Tecnifibre TF40 290 16x19 V3 vs Tecnifibre TF40 315 18x20 V1](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/tecnifibre-tf40-290-16x19-v3-vs-tecnifibre-tf40-315-18x20-v1/)

---
Source: https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/dunlop-cx-200-ls-2024-vs-tecnifibre-tf40-290-16x19-v3/