<!-- HEAD IG Boom XCeed vs Wilson Burn 105S V6: which one to choose? -->
# HEAD IG Boom XCeed vs Wilson Burn 105S V6

- Head size: 107 in² on HEAD IG Boom XCeed and 105 in² on Wilson Burn 105S V6.

Scores calculated from the specs ([how we calculate](https://racquetrank.com/ca/methodology/)). Reference prices from stores, checked every day.

## Racquets in the comparison

2 racquets Tennis

- [IG Boom XCeed HEAD](https://racquetrank.com/ca/tennis/head/ig-boom-xceed/)

- [Burn 105S V6 Wilson](https://racquetrank.com/ca/tennis/wilson/burn-105s-v6/)

Search racquets

Highlight differencesHide identical
Best in row Different Same

| 2 racquetsLowest price | IG Boom XCeed HEAD RR Score 71 out of 100, Good | Burn 105S V6 Wilson | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

| 2 racquetsHighest RR Score: IG Boom XCeed HEAD (71). | #1HEADIG Boom XCeed HEAD RR Score 71 out of 100, Good See price at Merchant of TennisOffers | #2WilsonBurn 105S V6 WilsonSee price at AmazonOffers | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Where to buy | | | |
| All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | Merchant of TennisSee priceSee offer details | AmazonSee priceTenniszonSee priceSee offer details | |
| RR Score | | | |
| RR Score | RR Score 71 out of 100, Good | No data | |
| Dimensions | | | |
| Weight unstrung | 260 g | No data | |
| Weight strung | 275 g | 278 g | |
| Head size | 107 in² | 105 in² | |
| Length | 27 in | 27 in | |
| Balance point | 345 mm | 335 mm | |
| Swingweight | 305305 (strung) | No data | |
| Construction | | | |
| Stiffness (RA) | 60 RA | No data | |
| String pattern | 16x19 | No data | |
| Frame thickness | 23/26/23 mm | No data | |
| Material | Graphite with Innegra fiber | No data | |
| Offers summary | | | |
| Lowest price | No data | No data | |

## Other tennis comparisons

- [Dunlop LX 800 2024 vs Wilson Burn 105S V6](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/dunlop-lx-800-2024-vs-wilson-burn-105s-v6/)

- [Wilson Burn 100ULS V5 vs Wilson Burn 105S V6](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/wilson-burn-100uls-v5-vs-wilson-burn-105s-v6/)

- [Wilson Burn 100LS V5 vs Wilson Burn 105S V6](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/wilson-burn-100ls-v5-vs-wilson-burn-105s-v6/)

- [Tecnifibre Fire 260 OS 2026 vs Wilson Burn 105S V6](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/tecnifibre-fire-260-os-2026-vs-wilson-burn-105s-v6/)

- [HEAD Boom Junior 2026 vs HEAD IG Boom XCeed](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/head-boom-junior-2026-vs-head-ig-boom-xceed/)

- [HEAD Boom Junior 25 Alternate 2026 vs HEAD IG Boom XCeed](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/head-boom-junior-25-alternate-2026-vs-head-ig-boom-xceed/)

- [HEAD Boom Junior 26 2024 vs HEAD IG Boom XCeed](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/head-boom-junior-26-2024-vs-head-ig-boom-xceed/)

- [HEAD Boom Junior 26 Alternate 2026 vs HEAD IG Boom XCeed](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/head-boom-junior-26-alternate-2026-vs-head-ig-boom-xceed/)

- [HEAD Boom Junior Alternate 2026 vs HEAD IG Boom XCeed](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/head-boom-junior-alternate-2026-vs-head-ig-boom-xceed/)

- [HEAD Boom MP 2025 vs HEAD IG Boom XCeed](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/head-boom-mp-2025-vs-head-ig-boom-xceed/)

- [HEAD Boom MP Alternate 2026 vs HEAD IG Boom XCeed](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/head-boom-mp-alternate-2026-vs-head-ig-boom-xceed/)

- [HEAD Boom MP Arthur Ashe 2025 vs HEAD IG Boom XCeed](https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/head-boom-mp-arthur-ashe-2025-vs-head-ig-boom-xceed/)

---
Fonte: https://racquetrank.com/ca/compare/tennis/head-ig-boom-xceed-vs-wilson-burn-105s-v6/
