# Franklin C45 Tempo 14mm vs NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm - Shape: Standard on Franklin C45 Tempo 14mm and Hybrid on NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm. Scores calculated from the specs ([how we calculate](https://racquetrank.com/us/methodology/)). Reference prices from stores, checked every day. ## Racquets in the comparison 2 racquets Pickleball - [C45 Tempo 14mm Franklin](https://racquetrank.com/us/pickleball/franklin/c45-tempo-14mm/) - [X-Foam JMA 16mm NOX](https://racquetrank.com/us/pickleball/nox/x-foam-jma-16mm/) Search racquets Highlight differencesHide identical Best in row Different Same | 2 racquetsLowest price | C45 Tempo 14mm Franklin RR Score 72 out of 100, Good | X-Foam JMA 16mm NOX | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2 racquetsHighest RR Score: C45 Tempo 14mm Franklin (72). | #1FranklinC45 Tempo 14mm Franklin RR Score 72 out of 100, Good See price at Tennis WarehouseOffers | #2NOXX-Foam JMA 16mm NOXSee price at Pickleball WarehouseOffers | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Where to buy | | | | | All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | Tennis WarehouseSee priceSee offer details | Pickleball WarehouseSee priceSee offer details | | | RR Score | | | | | RR Score | RR Score 72 out of 100, Good | No data | | | Dimensions | | | | | Weight | 7.7 oz7.5 to 7.9 oz | No data | | | Width | 7.9 in | No data | | | Length | 15.7 in | No data | | | Grip length | 5.1 in | No data | | | Grip circumference | 4.3 in | No data | | | Shape | Standard | Hybrid | | | Construction | | | | | Face material | Raw T700 carbon at 45 degrees | No data | | | Core | POWERFLEX polymer | X-Foam foam | | | Core thickness | 14 mm | 16 mm | | | Edge protection | Yes | No data | | | USA Pickleball approved | YesUSAP and UPA-A | No data | | | Offers summary | | | | | Lowest price | No data | No data | | ## Other pickleball comparisons - [NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta InfiniGrit](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/nox-x-foam-jma-16mm-vs-selkirk-luxx-control-air-invikta-infinigrit/) - [NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Selkirk Amped Control S2](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/nox-x-foam-jma-16mm-vs-selkirk-amped-control-s2/) - [Franklin C45 Hybrid 14mm vs Franklin C45 Tempo 14mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/franklin-c45-hybrid-14mm-vs-franklin-c45-tempo-14mm/) - [HEAD Gravity Tour vs NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/head-gravity-tour-vs-nox-x-foam-jma-16mm/) - [NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Paddletek Bantam GTO-C 14.3mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/nox-x-foam-jma-16mm-vs-paddletek-bantam-gto-c-14-3mm/) - [Franklin C45 Dynasty 14mm vs Franklin C45 Tempo 14mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/franklin-c45-dynasty-14mm-vs-franklin-c45-tempo-14mm/) - [Franklin C45 Parris Todd 13.25mm vs Franklin C45 Tempo 14mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/franklin-c45-parris-todd-13-25mm-2025-vs-franklin-c45-tempo-14mm/) - [Franklin C45 Tempo 14mm vs Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/franklin-c45-tempo-14mm-vs-paddletek-bantam-esq-c-14-3mm-2024/) - [Franklin C45 Tempo 14mm vs Vatic Pro Prism Flash 14mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/franklin-c45-tempo-14mm-vs-vatic-pro-prism-flash-14mm/) - [NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/nox-x-foam-jma-16mm-vs-paddletek-bantam-esq-c-14-3mm-2024/) - [NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Selkirk LUXX InfiniGrit Invikta](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/nox-x-foam-jma-16mm-vs-selkirk-luxx-infinigrit-invikta/) --- Fonte: https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/franklin-c45-tempo-14mm-vs-nox-x-foam-jma-16mm/