<!-- Holbrook Mav 16mm vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm: which one to choose? -->
# Holbrook Mav 16mm vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm

Scores calculated from the specs ([how we calculate](https://racquetrank.com/us/methodology/)). Reference prices from stores, checked every day.

## Racquets in the comparison

2 racquets Pickleball

- [Mav 16mm Holbrook](https://racquetrank.com/us/pickleball/holbrook/mav-16mm-2026/)

- [Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm JOOLA](https://racquetrank.com/us/pickleball/joola/perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm/)

Search racquets

Highlight differencesHide identical
Best in row Different Same

| 2 racquetsLowest price | Mav 16mm Holbrook RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good | Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm JOOLA RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

| 2 racquetsHighest RR Score: Mav 16mm Holbrook (81). | #1HolbrookMav 16mm Holbrook RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good See price at HolbrookOffers | #2JOOLAPerseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm JOOLA RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good See price at Badminton WarehouseOffers | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Where to buy | | | |
| All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | HolbrookSee priceSee offer details | Badminton WarehouseSee priceSee offer details | |
| RR Score | | | |
| RR Score | RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good | RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good | |
| Dimensions | | | |
| Weight | 8 oz | 8 oz | |
| Width | 7.5 in | 7.5 in | |
| Length | 16.5 in | 16.5 in | |
| Grip length | 5.5 in | 5.5 in | |
| Grip circumference | 4.3 in | 4.3 in | |
| Shape | Elongated | Elongated | |
| Construction | | | |
| Face material | Peel Ply textured carbon | Textured carbon | |
| Core | Polypropylene honeycomb | Honeycomb polymer | |
| Core thickness | 16 mm | 16 mm | |
| Edge protection | No data | Yes | |
| Thermoformed | Yes | Yes | |
| USA Pickleball approved | No data | Yes | |
| Offers summary | | | |
| Lowest price | No data | No data | |

## Other pickleball comparisons

- [Engage Pursuit Alpha Pro 16mm vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/engage-pursuit-alpha-pro-16mm-2025-vs-joola-perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm/)

- [JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm vs Luzz Pro Cannon](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/joola-perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm-vs-luzz-pro-cannon-2025/)

- [Engage Pursuit Alpha Pro 16mm vs Holbrook Mav 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/engage-pursuit-alpha-pro-16mm-2025-vs-holbrook-mav-16mm-2026/)

- [HEAD Radical Tour EX vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/head-radical-tour-ex-2024-vs-joola-perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm/)

- [Holbrook Mav 16mm vs Luzz Pro Cannon](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/holbrook-mav-16mm-2026-vs-luzz-pro-cannon-2025/)

- [JOOLA Perseus Pro IV 16mm vs JOOLA Perseus Pro V Ben Johns 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/joola-perseus-pro-iv-16mm-pro-iv-vs-joola-perseus-pro-v-ben-johns-16mm/)

- [JOOLA Perseus Double Vision 16mm vs JOOLA Perseus Pro V Ben Johns 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/joola-perseus-double-vision-16mm-vs-joola-perseus-pro-v-ben-johns-16mm/)

- [JOOLA Perseus Heat Vision 16mm vs JOOLA Perseus Pro V Ben Johns 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/joola-perseus-heat-vision-16mm-vs-joola-perseus-pro-v-ben-johns-16mm/)

- [JOOLA Ben Johns Perseus 14mm CFS vs JOOLA Perseus Pro V Ben Johns 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/joola-ben-johns-perseus-14mm-cfs-vs-joola-perseus-pro-v-ben-johns-16mm/)

- [JOOLA Ben Johns Perseus Pro 14mm IV vs JOOLA Perseus Pro V Ben Johns 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/joola-ben-johns-perseus-pro-14mm-iv-vs-joola-perseus-pro-v-ben-johns-16mm/)

- [JOOLA Perseus 16mm CFS vs JOOLA Perseus Pro V Ben Johns 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/joola-perseus-16mm-cfs-vs-joola-perseus-pro-v-ben-johns-16mm/)

---
Fonte: https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/holbrook-mav-16mm-2026-vs-joola-perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm/
