<!-- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm vs Luzz Pro Cannon: which one to choose? -->
# JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm vs Luzz Pro Cannon

Scores calculated from the specs ([how we calculate](https://racquetrank.com/us/methodology/)). Reference prices from stores, checked every day.

## Racquets in the comparison

2 racquets Pickleball

- [Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm JOOLA](https://racquetrank.com/us/pickleball/joola/perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm/)

- [Pro Cannon Luzz](https://racquetrank.com/us/pickleball/luzz/pro-cannon-2025/)

Search racquets

Highlight differencesHide identical
Best in row Different Same

| 2 racquetsLowest price | Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm JOOLA RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good | Pro Cannon Luzz RR Score 80 out of 100, Very good | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

| 2 racquetsHighest RR Score: Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm JOOLA (81). | #1JOOLAPerseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm JOOLA RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good See price at Badminton WarehouseOffers | #2LuzzPro Cannon Luzz RR Score 80 out of 100, Very good See price at Tennis WarehouseOffers | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Where to buy | | | |
| All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | Badminton WarehouseSee priceSee offer details | Tennis WarehouseSee priceSee offer details | |
| RR Score | | | |
| RR Score | RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good | RR Score 80 out of 100, Very good | |
| Dimensions | | | |
| Weight | 8 oz | 7.9 oz | |
| Width | 7.5 in | No data | |
| Length | 16.5 in | No data | |
| Grip length | 5.5 in | No data | |
| Grip circumference | 4.3 in | No data | |
| Shape | Elongated | Elongated | |
| Construction | | | |
| Face material | Textured carbon | T700 carbon | |
| Core | Honeycomb polymer | Carbon matrix | |
| Core thickness | 16 mm | 16 mm | |
| Edge protection | Yes | No data | |
| Thermoformed | Yes | Yes | |
| USA Pickleball approved | Yes | No data | |
| Offers summary | | | |
| Lowest price | No data | No data | |

## Other pickleball comparisons

- [Engage Pursuit Alpha Pro 16mm vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/engage-pursuit-alpha-pro-16mm-2025-vs-joola-perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm/)

- [Holbrook Mav 16mm vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/holbrook-mav-16mm-2026-vs-joola-perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm/)

- [Engage Pursuit Alpha Pro 16mm vs Luzz Pro Cannon](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/engage-pursuit-alpha-pro-16mm-2025-vs-luzz-pro-cannon-2025/)

- [HEAD Radical Tour EX vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 CFS 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/head-radical-tour-ex-2024-vs-joola-perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm/)

- [Holbrook Mav 16mm vs Luzz Pro Cannon](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/holbrook-mav-16mm-2026-vs-luzz-pro-cannon-2025/)

- [Luzz Cannon vs Luzz Pro Cannon](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/luzz-cannon-2025-vs-luzz-pro-cannon-2025/)

- [Luzz Pro Cannon vs Selkirk SLK ERA Power Elongated](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/luzz-pro-cannon-2025-vs-selkirk-slk-era-power-elongated/)

- [Luzz Pro Cannon vs Volair Mach 1 Forza 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/luzz-pro-cannon-2025-vs-volair-mach-1-forza-16mm/)

- [JOOLA Perseus Pro IV 16mm vs JOOLA Perseus Pro V Ben Johns 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/joola-perseus-pro-iv-16mm-pro-iv-vs-joola-perseus-pro-v-ben-johns-16mm/)

- [JOOLA Perseus Double Vision 16mm vs JOOLA Perseus Pro V Ben Johns 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/joola-perseus-double-vision-16mm-vs-joola-perseus-pro-v-ben-johns-16mm/)

- [JOOLA Perseus Heat Vision 16mm vs JOOLA Perseus Pro V Ben Johns 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/joola-perseus-heat-vision-16mm-vs-joola-perseus-pro-v-ben-johns-16mm/)

---
Fonte: https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/joola-perseus-cfs-16-cfs-16mm-vs-luzz-pro-cannon-2025/
