# NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm - Shape: Hybrid on NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm and Standard on Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm. Scores calculated from the specs ([how we calculate](https://racquetrank.com/us/methodology/)). Reference prices from stores, checked every day. ## Racquets in the comparison 2 racquets Pickleball - [X-Foam JMA 16mm NOX](https://racquetrank.com/us/pickleball/nox/x-foam-jma-16mm/) - [Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm Paddletek](https://racquetrank.com/us/pickleball/paddletek/bantam-esq-c-14-3mm-2024/) Search racquets Highlight differencesHide identical Best in row Different Same | 2 racquetsLowest price | X-Foam JMA 16mm NOX | Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm Paddletek RR Score 72 out of 100, Good | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2 racquetsHighest RR Score: Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm Paddletek (72). | #1NOXX-Foam JMA 16mm NOXSee price at Pickleball WarehouseOffers | #2PaddletekBantam ESQ-C 14.3mm Paddletek RR Score 72 out of 100, Good See price at Pickleball CentralOffers | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Where to buy | | | | | All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | Pickleball WarehouseSee priceSee offer details | Pickleball CentralSee priceSee offer details | | | RR Score | | | | | RR Score | No data | RR Score 72 out of 100, Good | | | Dimensions | | | | | Weight | No data | 7.7 oz | | | Grip length | No data | 5.5 in | | | Shape | Hybrid | Standard | | | Construction | | | | | Face material | No data | Raw carbon | | | Core | X-Foam foam | Bantam polymer honeycomb | | | Core thickness | 16 mm | 14.3 mm | | | Offers summary | | | | | Lowest price | No data | No data | | ## Other pickleball comparisons - [Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14.3mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-esq-c-14-3mm-2024-vs-paddletek-bantam-tko-c-14-3mm/) - [NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta InfiniGrit](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/nox-x-foam-jma-16mm-vs-selkirk-luxx-control-air-invikta-infinigrit/) - [NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Selkirk Amped Control S2](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/nox-x-foam-jma-16mm-vs-selkirk-amped-control-s2/) - [HEAD Gravity Tour vs NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/head-gravity-tour-vs-nox-x-foam-jma-16mm/) - [Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam EX-L](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-esq-c-14-3mm-2024-vs-paddletek-bantam-ex-l/) - [Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam EX-L Pro](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-esq-c-14-3mm-2024-vs-paddletek-bantam-ex-l-pro/) - [Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam GTO-C 14.3mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-esq-c-14-3mm-2024-vs-paddletek-bantam-gto-c-14-3mm/) - [NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Paddletek Bantam GTO-C 14.3mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/nox-x-foam-jma-16mm-vs-paddletek-bantam-gto-c-14-3mm/) - [Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam TS-5](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-esq-c-14-3mm-2024-vs-paddletek-bantam-ts-5/) - [Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam TS-5 Pro](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-esq-c-14-3mm-2024-vs-paddletek-bantam-ts-5-pro/) - [Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-alw-c-14-3mm-vs-paddletek-bantam-esq-c-14-3mm-2024/) - [Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam TKO-CX 14.3mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-esq-c-14-3mm-2024-vs-paddletek-bantam-tko-cx-14-3mm/) --- Fonte: https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/nox-x-foam-jma-16mm-vs-paddletek-bantam-esq-c-14-3mm-2024/