# NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Selkirk Amped Control S2 - Shape: Hybrid on NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm and Wide on Selkirk Amped Control S2. Scores calculated from the specs ([how we calculate](https://racquetrank.com/us/methodology/)). Reference prices from stores, checked every day. ## Racquets in the comparison 2 racquets Pickleball - [X-Foam JMA 16mm NOX](https://racquetrank.com/us/pickleball/nox/x-foam-jma-16mm/) - [Amped Control S2 Selkirk](https://racquetrank.com/us/pickleball/selkirk/amped-control-s2/) Search racquets Highlight differencesHide identical Best in row Different Same | 2 racquetsLowest price | X-Foam JMA 16mm NOX | Amped Control S2 Selkirk RR Score 62 out of 100, RR Score | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2 racquetsHighest RR Score: Amped Control S2 Selkirk (62). | #1NOXX-Foam JMA 16mm NOXSee price at Pickleball WarehouseOffers | #2SelkirkAmped Control S2 Selkirk RR Score 62 out of 100, RR Score See price at AmazonOffers | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Where to buy | | | | | All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | Pickleball WarehouseSee priceSee offer details | AmazonSee priceSee offer details | | | RR Score | | | | | RR Score | No data | RR Score 62 out of 100, RR Score | | | Dimensions | | | | | Weight | No data | 8.2 oz | | | Width | No data | 8 in | | | Length | No data | 15.8 in | | | Grip length | No data | 4.7 in | | | Grip circumference | No data | 4.3 in | | | Shape | Hybrid | Wide | | | Construction | | | | | Face material | No data | FiberFlex+ fiberglass | | | Core | X-Foam foam | X5 polypropylene honeycomb | | | Core thickness | 16 mm | 16 mm | | | Edge protection | No data | Yes | | | USA Pickleball approved | No data | Yes | | | Offers summary | | | | | Lowest price | No data | No data | | ## Other pickleball comparisons - [NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta InfiniGrit](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/nox-x-foam-jma-16mm-vs-selkirk-luxx-control-air-invikta-infinigrit/) - [Selkirk Amped Control Epic vs Selkirk Amped Control S2](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/selkirk-amped-control-epic-vs-selkirk-amped-control-s2/) - [Selkirk Amped Control Invikta vs Selkirk Amped Control S2](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/selkirk-amped-control-invikta-vs-selkirk-amped-control-s2/) - [Selkirk Amped Control S2 vs Selkirk Amped Epic](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/selkirk-amped-control-s2-vs-selkirk-amped-epic-2018/) - [Selkirk Amped Control S2 vs Selkirk Amped Invikta](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/selkirk-amped-control-s2-vs-selkirk-amped-invikta-2018/) - [Selkirk Amped Control S2 vs Selkirk Amped S2](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/selkirk-amped-control-s2-vs-selkirk-amped-s2-2018/) - [Gearbox G14 Quad 14mm vs Selkirk Amped Control S2](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/gearbox-g14-quad-14mm-2024-vs-selkirk-amped-control-s2/) - [Gamma Voltage 5.0 vs Selkirk Amped Control S2](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/gamma-voltage-5-0-vs-selkirk-amped-control-s2/) - [HEAD Gravity Tour vs NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/head-gravity-tour-vs-nox-x-foam-jma-16mm/) - [NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Paddletek Bantam GTO-C 14.3mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/nox-x-foam-jma-16mm-vs-paddletek-bantam-gto-c-14-3mm/) - [Franklin C45 Tempo 14mm vs NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/franklin-c45-tempo-14mm-vs-nox-x-foam-jma-16mm/) --- Fonte: https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/nox-x-foam-jma-16mm-vs-selkirk-amped-control-s2/