# Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14.3mm vs Six Zero Quartz 15mm Scores calculated from the specs ([how we calculate](https://racquetrank.com/us/methodology/)). Reference prices from stores, checked every day. ## Racquets in the comparison 2 racquets Pickleball - [Bantam ALW-C 14.3mm Paddletek](https://racquetrank.com/us/pickleball/paddletek/bantam-alw-c-14-3mm/) - [Quartz 15mm Six Zero](https://racquetrank.com/us/pickleball/six-zero/quartz-15mm/) Search racquets Highlight differencesHide identical Best in row Different Same | 2 racquetsLowest price | Bantam ALW-C 14.3mm Paddletek RR Score 72 out of 100, Good | Quartz 15mm Six Zero RR Score 66 out of 100, RR Score | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2 racquetsHighest RR Score: Bantam ALW-C 14.3mm Paddletek (72). | #1PaddletekBantam ALW-C 14.3mm Paddletek RR Score 72 out of 100, Good See price at Pickleball CentralOffers | #2Six ZeroQuartz 15mm Six Zero RR Score 66 out of 100, RR Score See price at Pickleball CentralOffers | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Where to buy | | | | | All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | Pickleball CentralSee priceSee offer details | Pickleball CentralSee priceSee offer details | | | RR Score | | | | | RR Score | RR Score 72 out of 100, Good | RR Score 66 out of 100, RR Score | | | Dimensions | | | | | Weight | 7.7 oz7.5 to 7.8 oz | 7.9 oz225 g ±10 g | | | Width | 7.8 in | 7.9 in | | | Length | 15.6 in | 16 in | | | Grip length | 5.3 in | 5 in | | | Grip circumference | 4.3 in | 4.1 in | | | Shape | Wide | Wide | | | Construction | | | | | Face material | Raw unidirectional PT-700 carbon | T300 carbon | | | Core | Bantam honeycomb polymer | Polypropylene honeycomb | | | Core thickness | 14.3 mm | 15 mm | | | Edge protection | Yes | No data | | | USA Pickleball approved | Yes | Yes | | | Offers summary | | | | | Lowest price | No data | No data | | ## Other pickleball comparisons - [Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14.3mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-alw-c-14-3mm-vs-paddletek-bantam-tko-c-14-3mm/) - [Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam EX-L](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-alw-c-14-3mm-vs-paddletek-bantam-ex-l/) - [Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam EX-L Pro](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-alw-c-14-3mm-vs-paddletek-bantam-ex-l-pro/) - [Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam GTO-C 14.3mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-alw-c-14-3mm-vs-paddletek-bantam-gto-c-14-3mm/) - [Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam TS-5](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-alw-c-14-3mm-vs-paddletek-bantam-ts-5/) - [Six Zero Coral 16mm Widebody vs Six Zero Quartz 15mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/six-zero-coral-16mm-widebody-vs-six-zero-quartz-15mm/) - [JOOLA Collin Johns Scorpeus 16mm CFS vs Six Zero Quartz 15mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/joola-collin-johns-scorpeus-16mm-cfs-vs-six-zero-quartz-15mm/) - [Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam TS-5 Pro](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-alw-c-14-3mm-vs-paddletek-bantam-ts-5-pro/) - [Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam TKO-CX 14.3mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-alw-c-14-3mm-vs-paddletek-bantam-tko-cx-14-3mm/) - [Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7mm vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14.3mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-alw-c-12-7mm-2024-vs-paddletek-bantam-alw-c-14-3mm/) - [Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14.3mm vs Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-alw-c-14-3mm-vs-paddletek-bantam-esq-c-14-3mm-2024/) --- Fonte: https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/paddletek-bantam-alw-c-14-3mm-vs-six-zero-quartz-15mm/