# Selkirk OMNI Widebody 2026 vs Wilson Cadence Strikefoam Pro 16 Scores calculated from the specs ([how we calculate](https://racquetrank.com/us/methodology/)). Reference prices from stores, checked every day. ## Racquets in the comparison 2 racquets Pickleball - [OMNI Widebody 2026 Selkirk](https://racquetrank.com/us/pickleball/selkirk/omni-widebody-2026/) - [Cadence Strikefoam Pro 16 Wilson](https://racquetrank.com/us/pickleball/wilson/cadence-strikefoam-pro-16-2026/) Search racquets Highlight differencesHide identical Best in row Different Same | 2 racquetsLowest price | OMNI Widebody 2026 Selkirk RR Score 89 out of 100, Very good | Cadence Strikefoam Pro 16 Wilson RR Score 75 out of 100, Good | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2 racquetsHighest RR Score: OMNI Widebody 2026 Selkirk (89). | #1SelkirkOMNI Widebody 2026 Selkirk RR Score 89 out of 100, Very good See price at Tennis WarehouseOffers | #2WilsonCadence Strikefoam Pro 16 Wilson RR Score 75 out of 100, Good See price at Tennis WarehouseOffers | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Where to buy | | | | | All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | Tennis WarehouseSee priceSee offer details | Tennis WarehouseSee priceSee offer details | | | RR Score | | | | | RR Score | RR Score 89 out of 100, Very good | RR Score 75 out of 100, Good | | | Dimensions | | | | | Weight | 8.1 oz7.9 to 8.2 oz | 8.1 oz230 g | | | Width | 8 in | 8.3 in | | | Length | 16.0 in | 15.8 in | | | Grip length | 5.6 in | 4.7 in | | | Grip circumference | 4.3 in | 4.1 in | | | Shape | Wide | Wide | | | Construction | | | | | Face material | T700 Multistrata carbon with InfiniGrit | Raw carbon over fiberglass | | | Core | ReactCore PureFoam foam | StrikeFoam solid foam | | | Core thickness | 16 mm | 16 mm | | | Edge protection | Yes | No data | | | USA Pickleball approved | Yes | No data | | | Offers summary | | | | | Lowest price | No data | No data | | ## Other pickleball comparisons - [Selkirk LABS Project Boomstik Widebody vs Selkirk OMNI Widebody 2026](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/selkirk-labs-project-boomstik-widebody-vs-selkirk-omni-widebody-2026/) - [Selkirk LABS Project 007 Epic 14mm vs Selkirk OMNI Widebody 2026](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/selkirk-labs-project-007-epic-14mm-2024-vs-selkirk-omni-widebody-2026/) - [Selkirk LABS Project 008 Epic 13mm vs Selkirk OMNI Widebody 2026](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/selkirk-labs-project-008-epic-13mm-2025-vs-selkirk-omni-widebody-2026/) - [Selkirk LABS Project 008 Tour 13mm vs Selkirk OMNI Widebody 2026](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/selkirk-labs-project-008-tour-13mm-2025-vs-selkirk-omni-widebody-2026/) - [Selkirk LABS Project 008 vs Selkirk OMNI Widebody 2026](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/selkirk-labs-project-008-vs-selkirk-omni-widebody-2026/) - [Selkirk OMNI Widebody 2026 vs Selkirk SLK Halo Control Max](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/selkirk-omni-widebody-2026-vs-selkirk-slk-halo-control-max/) - [Selkirk OMNI Widebody 2026 vs Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro Bloom 16mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/selkirk-omni-widebody-2026-vs-vatic-pro-v-sol-pro-bloom-16mm-2025/) - [ProKennex Pro Flight vs Wilson Cadence Strikefoam Pro 16](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/prokennex-pro-flight-vs-wilson-cadence-strikefoam-pro-16-2026/) - [Wilson Cadence Strikefoam Pro 16 vs Wilson Cadence Tour 12mm](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/wilson-cadence-strikefoam-pro-16-2026-vs-wilson-cadence-tour-12mm-2024/) - [Selkirk SLK ERA Power Widebody vs Wilson Cadence Strikefoam Pro 16](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/selkirk-slk-era-power-widebody-vs-wilson-cadence-strikefoam-pro-16-2026/) - [Selkirk SLK Dauntless Widebody vs Wilson Cadence Strikefoam Pro 16](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/selkirk-slk-dauntless-widebody-2026-vs-wilson-cadence-strikefoam-pro-16-2026/) --- Fonte: https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/pickleball/selkirk-omni-widebody-2026-vs-wilson-cadence-strikefoam-pro-16-2026/