# HEAD Ti. Conquest vs Wilson Hyper Hammer 5.3 - Head size: 108 in² on HEAD Ti. Conquest and 110 in² on Wilson Hyper Hammer 5.3. - String pattern: 18x19 on HEAD Ti. Conquest and 16x20 on Wilson Hyper Hammer 5.3. Scores calculated from the specs ([how we calculate](https://racquetrank.com/us/methodology/)). Reference prices from stores, checked every day. ## Racquets in the comparison 2 racquets Tennis - [Ti. Conquest HEAD](https://racquetrank.com/us/tennis/head/ti-conquest/) - [Hyper Hammer 5.3 Wilson](https://racquetrank.com/us/tennis/wilson/hyper-hammer-5-3/) Search racquets Highlight differencesHide identical Best in row Different Same | 2 racquetsLowest price | Ti. Conquest HEAD RR Score 65 out of 100, RR Score | Hyper Hammer 5.3 Wilson RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2 racquetsHighest RR Score: Hyper Hammer 5.3 Wilson (81). | #1HEADTi. Conquest HEAD RR Score 65 out of 100, RR Score See price at Amazon | #2WilsonHyper Hammer 5.3 Wilson RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good See price at Amazon | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Where to buy | | | | | All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | AmazonSee priceDo It TennisSee price | AmazonSee price | | | RR Score | | | | | RR Score | RR Score 65 out of 100, RR Score | RR Score 81 out of 100, Very good | | | Dimensions | | | | | Weight strung | 275 g | 255 g | | | Head size | 108 in² | 110 in² | | | Length | 27 in | 27.5 in | | | Balance point | 325 mm | No data | | | Construction | | | | | String pattern | 18x19 | 16x20 | | | Material | Aluminum with Nano Titanium | Graphite | | | Offers summary | | | | | Lowest price | No data | No data | | ## Other tennis comparisons - [Wilson Hyper Hammer 5.3 vs Wilson Hyper Hammer 5.3 Stretch OS](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/wilson-hyper-hammer-5-3-vs-wilson-hyper-hammer-5-3-stretch-os/) - [HEAD Ti. Conquest vs HEAD Ti S6](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/head-ti-conquest-vs-head-ti-s6/) - [HEAD Ti. Conquest vs HEAD Ti. Reward 2021](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/head-ti-conquest-vs-head-ti-reward-2021/) - [HEAD Ti. Conquest vs Yonex EZONE 115 2025](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/head-ti-conquest-vs-yonex-ezone-115-2025/) - [HEAD Ti. Conquest vs Wilson Burn 105S V6](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/head-ti-conquest-vs-wilson-burn-105s-v6/) - [Wilson Hyper Hammer 5.3 vs Yonex EZONE 115 2025](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/wilson-hyper-hammer-5-3-vs-yonex-ezone-115-2025/) - [Toalson OVR 108 vs Wilson Hyper Hammer 5.3](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/toalson-ovr-108-vs-wilson-hyper-hammer-5-3/) - [Toalson OVR 108 Ver.2.0 vs Wilson Hyper Hammer 5.3](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/toalson-ovr-108-ver-2-0-vs-wilson-hyper-hammer-5-3/) - [HEAD Ti. Conquest vs Wilson Profile Hyperspeed](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/head-ti-conquest-vs-wilson-profile-hyperspeed/) - [Babolat Pure Drive Wimbledon 2025 vs Dunlop FX 500 Junior 26](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/babolat-pure-drive-wimbledon-2025-vs-dunlop-fx-500-junior-26/) - [Babolat Pure Drive Wimbledon 2025 vs Dunlop FX Team 100](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/babolat-pure-drive-wimbledon-2025-vs-dunlop-fx-team-100/) --- Source: https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/head-ti-conquest-vs-wilson-hyper-hammer-5-3/