# HEAD Ti. Reward 2021 vs Wilson Aggressor 112 2024 - Head size: 110 in² on HEAD Ti. Reward 2021 and 112 in² on Wilson Aggressor 112 2024. Scores calculated from the specs ([how we calculate](https://racquetrank.com/us/methodology/)). Reference prices from stores, checked every day. ## Racquets in the comparison 2 racquets Tennis - [Ti. Reward 2021 HEAD](https://racquetrank.com/us/tennis/head/ti-reward-2021/) - [Aggressor 112 2024 Wilson](https://racquetrank.com/us/tennis/wilson/aggressor-112-2024/) Search racquets Highlight differencesHide identical Best in row Different Same | 2 racquetsLowest price | Ti. Reward 2021 HEAD RR Score 65 out of 100, RR Score No offers right now | Aggressor 112 2024 Wilson RR Score 65 out of 100, RR Score No offers right now | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2 racquetsHighest RR Score: Ti. Reward 2021 HEAD (65). | #1HEADTi. Reward 2021 HEAD RR Score 65 out of 100, RR Score No offers right now | #2WilsonAggressor 112 2024 Wilson RR Score 65 out of 100, RR Score No offers right now | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Where to buy | | | | | All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | No offers right now | No offers right now | | | RR Score | | | | | RR Score | RR Score 65 out of 100, RR Score | RR Score 65 out of 100, RR Score | | | Dimensions | | | | | Weight unstrung | 285 g | No data | | | Weight strung | No data | 307 g | | | Head size | 110 in² | 112 in² | | | Length | 27 in | 27.5 in | | | Balance point | 325 mm | 330 mm | | | Construction | | | | | String pattern | 16x19 | 16x19 | | | Material | Aluminum with Titanium technology | Aluminum (AirLite Alloy) | | | Offers summary | | | | | Lowest price | No data | No data | | ## Other tennis comparisons - [Wilson Aggressor 112 2024 vs Wilson Pro Staff Precision XL 110](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/wilson-aggressor-112-2024-vs-wilson-pro-staff-precision-xl-110/) - [HEAD Ti. Reward 2021 vs Wilson Pro Staff Precision XL 110](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/head-ti-reward-2021-vs-wilson-pro-staff-precision-xl-110/) - [HEAD Ti. Reward 2021 vs HEAD Ti S6](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/head-ti-reward-2021-vs-head-ti-s6/) - [ProKennex Ki Q+ 20 vs Wilson Aggressor 112 2024](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/prokennex-ki-q-20-vs-wilson-aggressor-112-2024/) - [HEAD Ti. Reward 2021 vs Wilson Impact](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/head-ti-reward-2021-vs-wilson-impact/) - [HEAD Ti. Conquest vs HEAD Ti. Reward 2021](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/head-ti-conquest-vs-head-ti-reward-2021/) - [HEAD Ti. Reward 2021 vs ProKennex Ki Q+ 20](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/head-ti-reward-2021-vs-prokennex-ki-q-20/) - [HEAD Ti. Reward 2021 vs ProKennex Ki Q+ 20 285g 2026](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/head-ti-reward-2021-vs-prokennex-ki-q-20-285g-2026/) - [Babolat Pure Drive Wimbledon 2025 vs Dunlop FX 500 Junior 26](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/babolat-pure-drive-wimbledon-2025-vs-dunlop-fx-500-junior-26/) - [Babolat Pure Drive Wimbledon 2025 vs Dunlop FX Team 100](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/babolat-pure-drive-wimbledon-2025-vs-dunlop-fx-team-100/) - [Babolat Pure Drive Wimbledon 2025 vs Dunlop FX Team 260](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/babolat-pure-drive-wimbledon-2025-vs-dunlop-fx-team-260/) --- Source: https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/head-ti-reward-2021-vs-wilson-aggressor-112-2024/