<!-- Srixon CX 200+ 2019 vs Wilson Pro Staff RF97 Autograph 2018: which one to choose? -->
# Srixon CX 200+ 2019 vs Wilson Pro Staff RF97 Autograph 2018

- Head size: 98 in² on Srixon CX 200+ 2019 and 97 in² on Wilson Pro Staff RF97 Autograph 2018.

Scores calculated from the specs ([how we calculate](https://racquetrank.com/us/methodology/)). Reference prices from stores, checked every day.

## Racquets in the comparison

2 racquets Tennis

- [CX 200+ 2019 Srixon](https://racquetrank.com/us/tennis/srixon/cx-200-2019-tenis/)

- [Pro Staff RF97 Autograph 2018 Wilson](https://racquetrank.com/us/tennis/wilson/pro-staff-rf97-autograph-2018/)

Search racquets

Highlight differencesHide identical
Best in row Different Same

| 2 racquetsLowest price | CX 200+ 2019 Srixon RR Score 71 out of 100, Good No offers right now | Pro Staff RF97 Autograph 2018 Wilson RR Score 73 out of 100, Good No offers right now | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

| 2 racquetsHighest RR Score: Pro Staff RF97 Autograph 2018 Wilson (73). | #1SrixonCX 200+ 2019 Srixon RR Score 71 out of 100, Good No offers right now | #2WilsonPro Staff RF97 Autograph 2018 Wilson RR Score 73 out of 100, Good No offers right now | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Where to buy | | | |
| All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | No offers right now | No offers right now | |
| RR Score | | | |
| RR Score | RR Score 71 out of 100, Good | RR Score 73 out of 100, Good | |
| Dimensions | | | |
| Weight strung | 323 g | 357 g | |
| Head size | 98 in² | 97 in² | |
| Length | 27.5 in | 27 in | |
| Balance point | 330 mm6 pts HL (strung) | 314 mm | |
| Swingweight | 340 | 335 | |
| Construction | | | |
| Stiffness (RA) | 66 RA | 68 RA | |
| String pattern | 16x19 | 16x19 | |
| Frame thickness | 21.5 mm | 21.5 mm | |
| Material | Graphite with Sonic Core Infinergy | No data | |
| Offers summary | | | |
| Lowest price | No data | No data | |

## Other tennis comparisons

- [Srixon CX 200+ 2019 vs Wilson RF 01 Pro 2024](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/srixon-cx-200-2019-tenis-vs-wilson-rf-01-pro-2024/)

- [Solinco Whiteout 305 XTD V2 vs Srixon CX 200+ 2019](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/solinco-whiteout-305-xtd-v2-vs-srixon-cx-200-2019-tenis/)

- [ProKennex Ki Q+ 5X Pro 2019 vs Srixon CX 200+ 2019](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/prokennex-ki-q-5x-pro-2019-vs-srixon-cx-200-2019-tenis/)

- [Srixon CX 200+ 2019 vs Srixon CX 200 LS 2019](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/srixon-cx-200-2019-tenis-vs-srixon-cx-200-ls-2019/)

- [Srixon CX 200+ 2019 vs Srixon CX 200 Tour 16x19 2019](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/srixon-cx-200-2019-tenis-vs-srixon-cx-200-tour-16x19-2019/)

- [Srixon CX 200+ 2019 vs Srixon CX 200 Tour 18x20 2019](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/srixon-cx-200-2019-tenis-vs-srixon-cx-200-tour-18x20-2019/)

- [Srixon CX 200+ 2019 vs Wilson Clash 100 Pro Reverse V3](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/srixon-cx-200-2019-tenis-vs-wilson-clash-100-pro-reverse-v3/)

- [Babolat Pure Drive Wimbledon 2025 vs Dunlop FX 500 Junior 26](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/babolat-pure-drive-wimbledon-2025-vs-dunlop-fx-500-junior-26/)

- [Babolat Pure Drive Wimbledon 2025 vs Dunlop FX Team 100](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/babolat-pure-drive-wimbledon-2025-vs-dunlop-fx-team-100/)

- [Babolat Pure Drive Wimbledon 2025 vs Dunlop FX Team 260](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/babolat-pure-drive-wimbledon-2025-vs-dunlop-fx-team-260/)

- [Wilson Pro Staff 97 Classic vs Wilson Pro Staff 97L Classic 2026](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/wilson-pro-staff-97-classic-vs-wilson-pro-staff-97l-classic-2026/)

- [Wilson Pro Staff 97 Classic vs Wilson Pro Staff X V14](https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/wilson-pro-staff-97-classic-vs-wilson-pro-staff-x-v14/)

---
Source: https://racquetrank.com/us/compare/tennis/srixon-cx-200-2019-tenis-vs-wilson-pro-staff-rf97-autograph-2018/
