Brasil
Canada
United Kingdom
Australia
Netherlands
France
España
Italia
السعوديةBabolat Baller EVO vs NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm
Scores calculated from the specs (how we calculate). Reference prices from stores, checked every day.
Racquets in the comparison
2 racquetsPickleballOn mobile, compare 2 racquets at a time. Remove one to swap.
Best in row Different Same
Where to buy
Reference price · we may earn a commission from these links
RR Score
RR Score
No data
Dimensions
Weight
7.9 oz225 ± 5 g
No data
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid
Construction
Face material
Raw RPM PureGrit carbon
No data
Core
No data
X-Foam foam
Core thickness
16 mm
16 mm
Offers summary
Lowest price
No data
No data
| 2 racquetsLowest price |  Baller EVO Babolat |  X-Foam JMA 16mm NOX |
| 2 racquets Highest RR Score: Baller EVO Babolat (67). | #1BabolatBaller EVO Babolat | #2NOXX-Foam JMA 16mm NOX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where to buy | |||
| All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | |||
| RR Score | |||
| RR Score | No data | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Weight | 7.9 oz225 ± 5 g | No data | |
| Shape | Hybrid | Hybrid | |
| Construction | |||
| Face material | Raw RPM PureGrit carbon | No data | |
| Core | No data | X-Foam foam | |
| Core thickness | 16 mm | 16 mm | |
| Offers summary | |||
| Lowest price | No data | No data | |
Other pickleball comparisons
- NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta InfiniGrit
- NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Selkirk Amped Control S2
- HEAD Gravity Tour vs NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm
- NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Paddletek Bantam GTO-C 14.3mm
- Babolat Baller EVO vs Gearbox GX2 Power Hybrid
- Babolat Baller EVO vs Gearbox GX2 Integra XL 16mm
- Franklin C45 Tempo 14mm vs NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm
- NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm
- NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Selkirk LUXX InfiniGrit Invikta
- Babolat Baller AXS vs Babolat Baller EVO
- Holbrook Aero T Metallic 16mm vs NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm