NOX X-Foam JM6 16mm vs NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm
Scores calculated from the specs (how we calculate). Reference prices from stores, checked every day.
Racquets in the comparison
2 racquetsPickleballOn mobile, compare 2 racquets at a time. Remove one to swap.
Best in row Different Same
Where to buy
No offers right now
Reference price · we may earn a commission from these links
RR Score
RR Score
No data
No data
Dimensions
Grip length
5.1 in
No data
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid
Construction
Core
X-Foam foam (4th generation)
X-Foam foam
Core thickness
16 mm
16 mm
Offers summary
Lowest price
No data
No data
| 2 racquets Highest RR Score: X-Foam JM6 16mm NOX (no score). | #1 NOXX-Foam JM6 16mm NOXNo offers right now | #2 NOXX-Foam JMA 16mm NOX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where to buy | |||
| All offersReference price · we may earn a commission from these links | No offers right now | ||
| RR Score | |||
| RR Score | No data | No data | |
| Dimensions | |||
| Grip length | 5.1 in | No data | |
| Shape | Hybrid | Hybrid | |
| Construction | |||
| Core | X-Foam foam (4th generation) | X-Foam foam | |
| Core thickness | 16 mm | 16 mm | |
| Offers summary | |||
| Lowest price | No data | No data | |
Other pickleball comparisons
- NOX X-Foam JM6 16mm vs Selkirk SLK Latitude Max 2024
- NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Selkirk SLK Latitude Max 2024
- NOX X-Foam JM6 16mm vs Paddletek Bantam GTO-C 14.3mm
- NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Paddletek Bantam GTO-C 14.3mm
- NOX X-Foam JM6 16mm vs Selkirk Amped Pro Air Holderness Family Epic
- NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Selkirk Amped Pro Air Holderness Family Epic
- NOX X-Foam JM6 16mm vs Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm
- NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm vs Paddletek Bantam ESQ-C 14.3mm
- NOX X-Foam Goldin 14mm by Grayson Goldin vs NOX X-Foam JM6 16mm
- NOX X-Foam JC6 16mm by Judit Castillo vs NOX X-Foam JM6 16mm
- NOX X-Foam JM6 16mm vs NOX X-Foam JMA 16mm by Jhonnatan Medina Alvarez
- NOX X-Foam JM6 16mm vs NOX X-Foam Nexo 14mm


